Powstania Warszawskiego 15
31-539 Kraków
Two founders can describe the same app idea in the same words and receive quotes that differ by a factor of two. The difference is rarely the agency. It is a handful of product decisions, most of them made without noticing, that each add weeks of work. This guide shows which decisions those are and how much time each one adds.
The cost of an MVP mobile app is the number of weeks it takes to build multiplied by the size of the team. A narrow first version with one type of user, simple payments and a basic admin panel usually takes eight to twelve weeks. Each of a few decisions can add three to six weeks on its own: a second type of user, marketplace payouts, offline data entry, real time chat or tracking, and integrations with existing systems. Deciding these before asking for quotes is what makes an MVP affordable.
Every serious quote, fixed price or not, is built the same way underneath. The agency breaks the product into flows, estimates how many weeks the team needs to build and test them, and multiplies by the cost of that team. Differences in rates between agencies exist, but they rarely explain a quote that is twice as high. Differences in assumed scope almost always do.
That is useful, because weeks are something you control. You cannot negotiate a team's rate down by half, but you can remove a decision that adds six weeks. Current rates and price bands are on our pricing page. The rest of this article is about the part of the equation you decide yourself.
For reference, a narrow first version usually takes eight to twelve weeks from kickoff to the stores. Products with payments, two types of users or offline work move into the twelve to twenty two week range. How a build is structured across those weeks is covered in our guide to MVP app development for startups.
These are the choices that move an MVP from one price band to the next. The ranges are typical additions to a narrow first version built in Flutter for iOS and Android. Your exact numbers depend on details, but the order of magnitude holds.
An app for customers only is one product. An app where customers book and providers accept, schedule and get paid is two products that share a database. Every flow now has a mirror on the other side, plus onboarding and verification for the second group.
Taking a card payment for your own service is a short task. Collecting money and paying part of it out to sellers or providers means identity checks, payout schedules, refunds and fees split across parties. Our guide to marketplace app payments explains why.
Showing cached data offline is cheap. Letting users create records offline and syncing them later, with rules for conflicts, is a separate piece of engineering. It is essential for field teams and unnecessary for most consumer apps.
In app chat, live location tracking and live status updates need a different backend setup, careful handling of background states and more testing on real devices. A notification that something happened is usually enough for version one.
Each connection to an ERP, CRM, booking engine or legacy database adds work, and the cost depends on how well that system is documented. An integration with no sandbox and no API documentation is the most common source of overruns.
Someone has to manage users, content and disputes. A lightweight panel on top of the database is enough for the first months. A fully designed back office with roles, reports and exports is a product of its own.
The expensive part of an MVP is rarely a screen. It is a promise the app makes to a second group of people.
Take a simple idea: an app for booking local dog walkers. Here is how the same concept produces two very different scopes, depending on decisions the founder makes before the first call.
Both versions test the same question: will people in this area pay to have their dog walked through an app? The lean version answers it in half the time. The features in the second column are real needs, but they are needs of a business that already has walkers and customers, which is exactly what the first version is meant to prove.
Deciding what stays out is the hardest part of scoping. Our guides to MVP app features and MVP scope go through that process feature by feature.
Some items look expensive on a wish list and turn out to be small. Knowing which ones helps you keep the features that matter to users without inflating the quote.
A two sided product like Loopy Jobs, a skill based marketplace with booking and chat, shows the opposite case: there, the second user type and the booking rules were the core of the product, so they belonged in the first version.
A quote covers design, development, testing and release. Running the app costs money from the first day it is live, and those costs belong in the budget from the start.
Quotes only become comparable when every agency prices the same scope. Send a written description of the first version with the user roles, the main flows and the decisions above already made. Ask each agency to list the assumptions behind its number and what is excluded.
If an agency returns a single number with no breakdown, ask for one. If two quotes differ widely, compare the assumptions line by line before comparing the totals. We describe that process in how to compare app development quotes.
When the scope is still open, a short discovery phase before the quote costs less than the overruns it prevents. Our app discovery workshop ends with a written scope and one fixed number, which is how we price an MVP under fixed price app development. More on how that works for first versions is in fixed price MVP development.
It depends on the weeks of work multiplied by the team. A narrow first version usually takes eight to twelve weeks; payments, two user types or offline work move it to twelve to twenty two weeks. Current price bands are on our pricing page.
Mostly five decisions: a second type of user, payouts to sellers or providers, offline data entry, real time chat or tracking, and integrations with existing systems. Each can add several weeks on its own.
No. With a cross platform framework such as Flutter, one codebase ships to both stores. The second platform adds testing and store submission work, not a second build.
Eight to twelve weeks for a narrow first version, and twelve to twenty two weeks for products with marketplace payments, two user types or offline work, counted from an agreed scope to release in the stores.
Store accounts, store commission on digital sales, hosting, third party services such as maps or SMS, payment processing fees and maintenance after launch.
Yes, when the scope is written down before the price is set. We scope first, then quote one fixed number. See fixed price MVP development.
Thomas sets the company's long term strategy and direction, identifies market opportunities, and owns business development and client acquisition. He builds strategic partnerships that last beyond a single project. He works with clients from the first strategy conversation, so their business goals, not just their feature list, drive every decision.
Describe the first version you have in mind. We will tell you which decisions drive its cost, what could wait for version two, and how many weeks the build would realistically take.
30 minutes, no preparation needed.