Powstania Warszawskiego 15
31-539 Kraków
Two agencies quote the same app and the numbers are far apart. Before deciding which one is expensive, check whether they are quoting the same thing. Most of the gap usually comes from what each quote includes, excludes and leaves unsaid.
To compare app development quotes fairly, first make them describe the same product: the same platforms, the same admin panel, the same backend and hosting, design, testing, store submission and handover. Then compare who carries the risk when something goes wrong: the pricing model, how changes are priced, how acceptance works and what happens after launch. Only then compare the teams themselves. A lower quote that leaves out an admin panel or store submission is not cheaper, it is a different product.
Every quote rests on assumptions the client never sees. One team assumes an admin panel because every app of this shape needs one. Another leaves it out because the brief did not mention it. One includes store submission and a handover of accounts; another treats them as your job.
None of this is dishonest. It is what happens when a brief leaves room for interpretation. The result is that the lowest number on the table is often the one describing the smallest product, and the difference surfaces later as change requests.
Put each quote against the same list. Where a quote is silent, ask in writing and add the answer to your comparison.
If you do not yet have a clear brief to send, start there; how to brief an app development company covers what the first call needs.
Take two quotes for the same booking app. Quote B is noticeably lower, and on the first read it looks like the better deal. Put side by side, line by line, it describes a smaller product.
Once the gaps are filled in, Quote B needs designs from somewhere else, an admin panel added later and a publishing step with no owner. It is also an estimate rather than a price, so its final cost is not known until the work is done.
Two quotes for an identical product can still carry very different risk. Four questions show where it sits.
On a fixed price, the agency absorbs it. On time and material, you do. Neither is wrong, but you should know which one you are signing.
AskIs this a price or an estimate?Every project changes. What matters is whether a change is agreed and priced before it is built, or discovered on the invoice.
AskHow do you handle a change request, step by step?A clear acceptance step, where the app is checked against the scope and signed off, is what closes the project. Without one, "done" is a matter of opinion.
AskWhat exactly do we sign at the end, and against what?Some agencies treat anything after launch as a new project. Others guarantee that everything in the agreed scope works, and fix it at their own cost if it does not.
AskDo you guarantee the agreed scope after launch, and for how long?The trade off between the two pricing models is covered in fixed price vs time and material, and the clauses that make a fixed price hold are in what a fixed price contract has to say.
A lower quote that leaves out the admin panel is not cheaper. It describes a different product.
With the product and the risk normalized, the remaining difference is the team. Three signals tell you more than a portfolio.
First, what they asked you. Clients who came to us after a project went wrong elsewhere describe the same early warning sign: on the first calls, the supplier asked about technology rather than about the business and the people who would use the app. A team that asks how your operation works is the one that will notice what your brief left out.
Second, who you will talk to during the build. Ask whether you will speak directly with the people building the app or through an intermediary, and who makes decisions on their side.
Third, projects of the same shape. A marketplace, a field app that has to work offline and a booking app fail in different places. Ask to see one similar to yours and how its hardest part was solved.
Star ratings say little, because almost every agency collects good ones. Read reviews for the middle of the story: what went wrong during the project and how the team responded. A review that mentions a problem handled well is worth more than five that say the team was great.
Then check whether the reviewed projects resemble yours in shape and size, and ask to speak with one of those clients directly.
At Apps Value every quote refers to a written scope document, agreed after a discovery call or a discovery workshop. The price is fixed, with payments tied to milestones of working software. Delivery closes with a signed acceptance protocol, and everything in the agreed scope that stops working is ours to fix; on larger contracts that comes with a one year warranty on the software.
Source code, documentation and the store accounts stay in your company's name. Price bands by project shape are on our pricing page, and how the model works is described under fixed price app development.
The same comparison applies to operational apps, where the admin side and integrations are usually the largest hidden lines; see field service app development and custom HVAC software development for how those are scoped.
Mostly because each quote assumes a different product. Admin panels, design, backend hosting, store submission and post launch fixes are included in some quotes and silently left out of others.
Only after the quotes describe the same product and the same risk. A lower number that excludes parts of the app, or that is an hourly estimate rather than a fixed price, often ends up costing more.
A written scope document, the platforms and admin panel, backend and hosting, design, testing and acceptance, store submission, handover of code and accounts, the pricing model, how changes are priced and what happens after launch.
Normalize the scope first, then score the risk each bid transfers to you, then evaluate the team. Scoring price alone rewards the bid that describes the smallest product.
Look past the ratings to how problems were handled, check that reviewed projects resemble yours in shape and size, and ask to speak with one of those clients.
Not always. A fixed price protects your budget when the scope can be described up front; time and material suits work whose shape is still unknown. What matters is knowing which one you are comparing.
Thomas sets the company's long term strategy and direction, identifies market opportunities, and owns business development and client acquisition. He builds strategic partnerships that last beyond a single project. He works with clients from the first strategy conversation, so their business goals, not just their feature list, drive every decision.
Send us the brief you sent to the other agencies. We will tell you what our quote would include, line by line, so you can put it next to the others.
30 minutes, no preparation needed.